Monday, March 25News That Matters

Doy Laurel’s Letter to Cory Aquino Explains Why “Cory Was Worse Than Ferdinand Marcos”

Salvador “Doy” H. Laurel was a top leader of the United Nationalist Democratic Organization (UNIDO), the political party that played a major role in ousting President Ferdinand Marcos via the 1986 People Power Revolution. He was the running mate of President Corazon “Cory” Aquino during the 1986 snap election and became the vice president.

Shortly after, Doy Laurel became the Vice President, Prime Minister, and Foreign Minister all the same time. But in late 1986, the office of Prime Minister was abolished. In September 1987, Laurel resigned as Secretary of Foreign Affairs. On August 13, 1988, he wrote a letter to President Cory Aquino, citing that she was worse than Marcos. It was featured in the book “Greed and Betrayal” by Cecilio T. Arillo.

Cory Aquino did not respond to Doy Laurel’s letter. Instead, she accused him of withdrawing his support during the series of coup attempts against her administration, with the worst one led by members of led by then-Colonel Gregorio “Gringo” Honasan, leader of the Reform the Armed Forces Movement (RAM.)

Below are the full context and a copy of Doy Laurel’s letter to Cory Aquino.

“Dear President Aquino,

I write at a time of deep anguish for our people. And so I shall not burden you with an undue sentiment. I shall go straight to the point.

You and I were called by Providence to serve as a turning point in our history. Our call to service was unique. We had sought out people’s vote in an election, but they gave us something more in a bloodless revolution that was to astound the world. At EDSA, we forged a covenant with God, country, and people.

I have tried to live by the covenant. Because of it, I have kept faith with your presidency, even when it was not possible to discern its purpose. Like many concerned Filipinos, I too had my doubts. But the ardent hopes rekindled at EDSA made me decide to give you my best arm to help you lead our people to better times.

But it did not work out that way. And so after temporizing for 18 months, I was compelled to resign as Secretary of Foreign Affairs on September 8, 1987. At that point, ‘fundamental differences’ had grown between us that went ‘to the very roots of political beliefs and moral principles which determine our conduct and performance as ‘servants of the people’s will and the people’s well being.’ Indeed, we seemed to stand on opposite sides of the ideological conflict. But seeing the possible harm that our sudden separation then could inflict upon the nation, I decided at my own expense, to mute these differences and to hold my peace. I did not join the opposition.

Now I feel I must write this letter to you and I do so with a heavy heart. For you and I have gone through much hardship and danger together in our lonely fight to restore democracy in our country—and there are feelings, thoughts, and memories that press for utterance.

But the true state of the nation must be told. And the painful truth is that the nation has gone from bad to worse, while you choose to stand aside in the puerile hope that the problems would simply solve themselves. The ‘new moral order’ to which we were solemnly committed has been perverted. It has become a haven for assassins and a den of thieves. Corruption, betrayal of the public trust and other high crimes have been laid at your door, including a complaint about impeachment, which your chief ally in Congress has already consigned to the archives.

We promised our people morality and decency in government. What do we have instead? The very opposite. It is now openly admitted by many, including your former Solicitor-General and some of your own close relatives in Congress, that the stench of “accumulated garbage”—I’m quoting your own first cousin, Congressman Emigdio Tanjuatco, Jr. —rises to high heaven; that the past years of Marcos are now beginning to look no worse than your first two years in office. And the reported controversies and scandals involving your closest relatives have become the object of our people’s outrage.

We promised to ‘break the back’ of the insurgency. But what is the record? From 16,500 NPA regular when Marcos fell, the communists now claim an armed strength of 25,200, of which 2,500 are in Metro Manila. They have infiltrated not only the trade unions, the schools, the churches and the media but your government, above all, and now ‘affect’ 20 percent of the country’s 42,000 barangays, according to official statistics.

In the fight against the insurgency, the nation, particularly our Armed Forces, expected you to provide the leadership, and to give decisive, clear and consistent orders. But you have chosen instead to behave like an innocent bystander, as though the insurgency were the sole concern of our soldiers, their widows, and orphans. At the height of our people’s euphoria in 1986, very few dared to question your unilateral decision to release the communist detainees, declare a ceasefire and hold peace talks with the National Democratic Front. But it has since become clear that these unilateral acts of yours have provided the biggest boon to the communist revolutionary movement. Yet, in your speech before the International Labor Organization (ILO) in Geneva last June, you singled out, as one of your most important achievements, your freeing of the communist detainees, with special emphasis on Jose Maria Sison, founder of the Communist Party of the Philippines.

In your recent State of the Nation address, you told our people that you have already broken the back of the insurgency.

The truth is that the peace and order situation is much worse today than when you came into office. It is now the number one problem of the nation.

From city to countryside, anarchy has spread. There is anarchy within the government, anarchy within the ruling coalesced parties and anarchy in the streets. These require your direct intervention. Yet you continue to ignore this problem.

On a number of occasions I have proposed that you convene the National Security Council and the Council of State to deliberate and, if possible, take a common stand on the many critical issues confronting the nation. You repeatedly rejected all these proposals claiming that they belong to your exclusive ‘prerogatives’ as President, and therefore you alone will decide them. You insist on holding in the hollow of your hand all your options for national survival, yet you refuse to adopt needed policies and programs that detail those options.

Despite my limited access to you, which became even more limited after I left the Cabinet, I tried to focus your attention on the need for a well-defined program of the government. Such a program was made available to you by UNIDO (United Nationalists Democratic Organizations) from the very start when it made you its presidential candidate. But in total disregard of all political norms, you completely ignored the party platform, refused to acknowledge your obligations to the party that sponsored your bid for power, and tolerated all open or underhanded assaults against it.

If I have held my peace until now in spite of your decision to ignore me altogether and to listen instead only to the counsel of those whose political, economic and social interests are more congruent with your own, it is because my sense of responsibility for this new government goes much farther back in time. It was I who, although already nominated for President by the UNIDO National Convention in June 1985, offered you, not a million signatures on a petition, but a solid, pre-existing political structure that would assure you of victory and a chance to fulfill the hopes and dreams of our suffering people.

Madame President: the time has come to tell our people with humility and candor that the presidency itself is the problem – because the task requires a higher level of competence – in the face of the advancing communist insurgency, the breakdown of law and order, the resurgence of widespread corruption, the paralyzation of political will and the growing desperation of our people. We need a leadership that does not only preach boldly but sternly and courageously enforces public order and public morality without regard to the toll levied upon one’s popularity. That leadership you have promised, but have failed to deliver.

While I accept my share of moral responsibility for having helped place your administration in power, that responsibility must be proportionate to the actual opportunity given me to participate in the decision-making process. That opportunity was close to zero.

It pains me to have to write this letter to the beloved widow of my childhood friend, Ninoy Aquino. But the truth must be told and I cannot avoid addressing this letter to a lady who happens to be President of the Philippines and who as such, cannot escape responsibility for the gross misgovernment of our Republic.

“Let me conclude with a trite but crucial reminder:

THE COUNTRY MUST COME FIRST AND NO SACRIFICE IS TOO GREAT FOR IT!

The responsibility to take the essential step to ease the nation’s suffering is yours alone and I would not wish to usurp it. But if, in your conscience, you feel you must now make the supreme sacrifice by stepping down from the presidency and call for an immediate election to enable our people to choose another leader for these critical times, I want you to know that I am ready to make that same sacrifice with you.

Should you, however, choose to remain in office and continue to misgovern the nation, I will have no choice but to forthwith disassociate myself completely from your government. I will be able to serve our country better by speaking out freely for the national interest and always for the sake of truth, justice, freedom, and democracy.

Sincerely yours,
SALVADOR H. LAUREL

Credit: Mike Acebedo Lopez Facebook
Doy Laurel remained vice president until the end of his term in 1992. He ran for president in the 1992 presidential elections under the Nacionalista Party. He lost to Fidel V. Ramos, whom Cory Aquino has supported. In 1996, then-President Ramos appointed Laurel as the chairman of the Philippine National Centennial Commission.

See Also:

Cory Aquino Bans Lino Brocka’s ‘Orapronobis’ Movie Due to Subversive Message (Full Movie)
Watch: Assassination Attempt on First Lady Imelda Marcos in 1972 (Video)

 
Okd2.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for website owners to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon(.com, .co.uk, .ca etc) and any other website that may be affiliated with Amazon Service LLC Associates Program.
 
Loading...

Leave Your Comments

comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *