The political circus continues after Sen. And vice presidential candidate Antonio Trillanes IV exposed the alleged billions of pesos of transactions involving BPI accounts of father and daughter, Mayor Rodrigo Duterte and Sarah Duterte.
Trillanes presented some documents to the media on Thursday, but the senator refused to give details about his source.
Veteran software engineer, Zandro Limpao tells how the “BPI account issue” of Duterte made Trillanes a law breaker.
Mr. Limpao shared his thoughts about the issue.
A few friends of mine asked me on what’s my take on the most recent electoral circus involving Mayor Rody Duterte and Senator Antonio “Sonny” Trillanes IV. Allow me to finally break my silence.
As a practicing software engineer of more than a decade, I’d like to answer using what I believe I do best, LOGIC.
Pre-conditions and Assumptions:
✔ Duterte is protected by RA 1405 otherwise known as Bank Secrecy Law unless otherwise he waives his right for such protection
✔ Duterte wanted Trillanes to file an “AFFIDAVIT” first before he discloses his bank records to the public
✔ Trillanes is trailing the VP Race since time immemorial
As you can see, there are only two (2) possible logical conclusions for Mr. Trillanes, and these are the following:
Number 1. Trillanes uses “Fake” Bank Documents
Since the documents circulating in the media are not legal instruments representing the bank records of the Mayor unlike a bank certificate or passbook, it is likely that these are fabricated evidences.
Number 2. Trillanes uses “Authentic” Bank Documents
The documents are authentic and represent actual transactions performed by a depositor or depositors to the account of the 2 Duterte’s. This also logically implies that Trillanes “breached” RA1405 otherwise known as Bank Secrecy Law for being able to get a hold of these documents without AMLC or any court order.
What is the purpose of the AFFIDAVIT Duterte wanted Trillanes to produce?
If Number 1 is true, Trillanes’ supposed AFFIDAVIT will qualify his falsification attempts as “PERJURY ON AN OATH” which is a criminal offense under Revised Penal Code.
If Number 2 is true, Trillanes’ supposed AFFIDAVIT is an admission that he committed breach on RA 1405 otherwise known as Bank Secrecy Law. He will also be punishable by law for such.
Regardless of whatever is the truth, whether Duterte has ill gotten wealth or not, TRILLANES IS A LAW BREAKER and a possible criminal with probable cause.
But if he will not file an AFFIDAVIT, then we can all safely say that these are all media stunts no different from his stupid rebellions some years ago.
YAN ANG PROBLEMA MR. TRILLANES IF YOU F**K AROUND A SEASONED LAWYER LIKE DUTERTE.
Let me know if you want to contest my logical analysis.
In relation to the alleged leaked information from BPI, some supporters slam the bank for not protecting their clients like Duterte.
In a Facebook post several hours earlier, Rosani Masau explains why she lost trust in BPI.
The post is now inactive before it was shared more than 3,000 times.